Log in or Register for enhanced features | Forgotten Password?
White Papers | Suppliers | Events | Report Store | Companies | Dining Club | Videos
Insurance Business Review
Return to: IBR Home | News

Employer penalties for health insurance mandate estimated to hit $31bn

Published 18 November 2016

Accenture’s new research has estimated that total employer penalties associated to the health insurance mandates from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) are likely to hit $31bn for 2016, nearly 50% more than the original estimates.

Under the PPACA’s “employer mandate,” employers that fail to offer health coverage to their employees are subject to financial penalties.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has projected that non-compliant employers – i.e., those not offering coverage – could face $21bn in penalties for the 2016 tax-reporting period.

However, an Accenture analysis has identified a new segment of employers, deemed “unintentionally non-compliant,” whose penalty exposure could amount to an additional $10bn during the 2016 tax period.

This group represents employers that offer compliant health coverage yet fail to meet IRS reporting requirements needed to demonstrate compliance under the law. In total, employer penalty exposure could reach $31bn for 2016, compared with an estimated $11bn for 2015.

Accenture payer consulting managing director Scott Brown said: “The challenge is that limited awareness exists on the magnitude of potential penalties.

“This is further compounded by an increase in coverage requirements despite that many employers are unaware of penalties incurred from last year.”

Under the PPACA’s mandate, employers with more than 50 full-time employees must provide health insurance benefits to avoid two potential penalties.

For the 2016 benefit year, to avoid incurring the “part A” penalty, employers must offer minimum essential coverage (MEC) to 95 percent of employees and dependents under 26 years-old.

Employers that meet the MEC threshold could still face the “part B” penalty if they fail to meet either the minimum value or affordability requirements included in the law.

Brown said: “It’s critical that employers understand the details and reporting requirements of the law to avoid unexpected penalties.”

“Not only do employers need to offer compliant health coverage, they need to meet the reporting requirements to demonstrate compliance.”

Accenture conducted an analysis of anonymized employer data from Tango Health to assess the penalty exposure under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act resulting from shifts in the minimum essential coverage threshold.

Penalty exposure was then compared to U.S. census data on total establishments and employer sizes. The estimate was modified to account for overlap with employers included in the original estimate by the Congressional Budget Office.

In this analysis and otherwise, Accenture does not intend to provide legal advice or recommendations to ensure compliance with laws or regulations.



Source: Company Press Release